I don’t think this is over…
DALLAS — The engineer who signed off on plans for the tent-like Dallas Cowboys practice facility that collapsed and seriously injured two team employees three years ago is paying a $12,000 fine to settle faulty design charges from the Texas Board of Professional Engineers.
In the consent order in which he agreed to the fine, Tabak neither admitted nor denied allegations that numerous elements in the plans for the building didn’t comply with engineering standards. The allegations were developed for the board by W. Gene Corley of Skokie, Ill., a structural engineer who led investigations into the World Trade Center attack and the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City.
“It appears that (Tabak) signed and sealed design plans for the facility that were not prepared in a careful and diligent manner,” the order states.
Tabak could have contested the fine in a hearing in front of an administrative law judge but chose not to.
So it has been an odd week and it is only Tuesday! Yesterday I was on the losing side of a debate on the “worth” of a structural design engineer.
I felt that a design engineer is a valuable resource that deserves respect (and money) while the other side essentially saw designers as commodities that should be managed and kept at the lowest possible cost. The engineers who sign the plans should be leading the projects but I see them becoming more like factory workers. Like I said, bad day.
Oh well, I had another goofy idea for a bridge, the Baton bridge. The bridge is a curved cantilevered structure that is balanced with a weight.
The more weight you put on the bridge causes the baton to rotate down, increasing the counter balancing force of the baton weight. Obviously you would need significant weight sensors in the bridge deck plus a computer system to adjust the angle of the baton.
Most importantly, you would require a great deal of liability insurance.
Click on the image to see the slide show.
And a watercolor sketch I did before work. (iPhone pic)
I was looking for a clever way to sign my paintings, which I have decided to frame ( just with a mat) and try to sell.
I doubt I can sell them for more than a couple of dollars but I think it will give the push to upgrade my skills.
So I thought instead of signing my name I would use a symbol as my signature. (my name is boring)
I found this Chinese symbol for “tall” and thought it would fit the bill. What do you think, too pretentious?
Two sides of the spectrum, fracking for oil and the pursuit of happiness.
David sent me a link to a story about fracking for oil overseas, turns out it’s a bit if a bust.
Fracking involves pumping a cocktail of water, chemicals, and sand under pressure to fracture rocks and release deposits of gas and oil. U.S. gas deposits within shale fields are among the world’s cheapest to exploit, thanks to accommodating geology. European basins tend to be smaller and occur in shapes that are less cost-efficient to access, says Pawel Poprawa, formerly a geologist at the Polish Geological Institute.
I listened to the new NPR show based on TED talks. This one focused on happiness and how limited choice might be better than too much choice. The link is to iTunes, but you probably can hear it directly on NPR.
Lastly here is a 15 minute watercolor tree, not great but fun. I tried painting with water soluble oil paint last night and they are okay. I think I need more linseed oil to make them workable. (I used my iPhone for the picture so the quality is low, no really the real thing is fracking awesome, no really, no really..okay you got me. )
I used to hate the Edmonton Oilers. When they had Wayne Gretsky, they beat my Calgary Flames every year in the playoffs.
It looks like Edmonton wants to build a new arena for their team based on a drop of oil.
Celebrate the oil, that’s what the NHL’s Edmonton Oilers owner, Daryl Katz, wants to do with the 360 Architecture design of a proposed new arena for Alberta’s oil-rich city.
Renderings were released recently by the City of Edmonton of a full council unveil on May 16 and a public comment period opening in June, the new $450 million arena is modeled after a drop of oil. Or a comma. Or a mutated boomerang. Okay, officially, we’ll stick with the drop of oil.
Mr. Petroski was on Science Friday talking about his new book.
PETROSKI: I think the history of bridges is very interesting. Over the past century and a half or so, there’s been a major bridge failure about every 30 years. So right now, we’re looking ahead to about the year 2025, 2030, not too much more than a decade from now there – if things follow as they have proceeded in the past, we can expect some kind of big surprise. It will be a bridge – that bridge type that hasn’t failed before. It will be something that will seemingly come out of the blue. But then in retrospect, looking at it and fitting it into the pattern, it’s something we will say, oh, we should have seen that coming.